For those who have not seen the debate on the floor of the State House on HR 202 Resolution Proposing Approval of an Agreement Between the State of Connecticut and the State Employees Bargaining Agent Coalition (SEBAC). Listening to the legislators speak is enlightening and eye-opening.
As employees, we voted to grant the State multi-billion dollar savings from our wages and benefits, an offering that one would think would be easily and quickly accepted by the House. It was accepted, but it was not easy. The resolution passed by a vote of 78-72 along party lines (Rep. Hampton was the only one who flipped on party lines).
The full debate was over 4 hours long, so below, we have identified the speakers and the time at which they spoke to shorten the process for anyone who wants to hear for themselves which legislators support state employees and which legislators want to gut our entire wage and benefit package.
Link to video of the debate provided through CT-N
Debate starts at the 29:43 minute of the video.
29:43 Rep D'agostino (Hamden) did an amazing job of explaining and supporting HR 202 to the chamber.
39:18 Rep Steinberg (Westport) asks a series of questions leading to his support of the agreement.
1:01:50 Rep Boyd (Pomfret, Eastford, Union Woodstock) spoke in favor of the agreement
1:11:09 Rep Wilms (Norwalk, New Canaan) eliminate collective bargaining and cut employee wages
1:30:00 Rep Davis (Ellington, East Windsor) Criticizes union contracts and unionization in general. Seeks to ensure that he can't break the contracts if passed. Advocates elimination of collective bargaining and for legislative control of wages, pension, healthcare
2:00:21 Rep Lavielle (Westport, Norwalk, Wilton) how the republican budget would be a better option (legislative changes to wages, pension, healthcare)
2:10:40 Rep Rovero (Killingly, Putnam, Thompson) spoke in favor of the agreement
2:22:30 Rep Srinivasan (Glastonbury) State employee benefits are too high and the agreement doesn't go far enough.
2:57:30 Rep Ziobron (East Haddam Colchester, East Hampton) Just angry, seething, and miserable. Would gut state employment entirely.
3:14 Rep Yaccarino (North Haven) The agreement is not fair and does not go far enough
3:21 Mitch Bolinsky (Newtown) complains about the budget, the process, the size of the raises and the cost of state employees.
3:22:40 Rep Devlin (Fairfield, Trumbull) the agreement doesn't go far enough and state employees should pay far more for benefits. Should push for far more concessions.
3:35:05 Rep delaCruz (Groton, New London) Praises the the process and the gravity of the agreement and the improvement of short and long-term budgets.
3:35:40 Rep O'neill (Southbury, Bridgewater, Roxbury, Washington) Argues about ability to break agreements and reasoning that rejectiong the agreement will allow legislative control fo wages and pension
4:03:19 Rep Stafstrom (Bridgeport) responds to the legal folly of those who plan to eliminate collective bargaining and simply impose legislative changes
4:08:05 Rep Winkler (Vernon)...simply: well stated, Mike!!
4:11 Rep Paolillo (New Haven) the agreement is true progress for the State and taxpayers
4:12:50 Rep DiMassa (West Haven) the agreement has tremednous savings and unionization is setting the example.
4:14:19 Rep Klarides (Derby, Orange, Woodbridge) House minority leader, heads up the campaign to have the legislature set our wages, pension, and healthcare unilaterally. Plans to severely cut wages and dramatically increase pension and medical contributions.
4:28:30 Rep Ritter (Hartford) a blazing endorsement for unionization and the necessity of this agreement.